Implementasi Asas Keterbukaan Terhadap Mekanisme Pengesahan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Tentang Cipta Kerja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v2i1.1913Keywords:
Job Creation Perppu, Omnibus Law, Principle of Openness, Constitutional CourtAbstract
In terms of the ratification of Perppu Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation, this raises pros and cons in society. This is because the Supreme Court Constitutional Decision Number 91 / PUU-XVIII / 2020 states that Law Number 11 of 2020 is unconstitutional conditional and must be immediately revised within 2 (two) years from the time the decision is issued. One of the reasons is because in the formation of the Job Creation Law, it does not involve full community participation and is not guided by the principle of openness. But the government actually responded by issuing the Job Creation Perppu which was later passed into law by the DPR-RI. In fact, between Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation and Perppu Number 2 of 2022 concerning job creation, it is relatively the same in terms of content. This study aims to examine a legal truth related to the mechanism for ratifying Government Regulations in Lieu of Law based on actual legal provisions. One of the legal provisions in the formation of laws and regulations is to make the principle of forming laws and regulations one of the conditions that must exist in the process of forming laws. One of its principles is the principle of openness. and the method used in this study is Normative. And in the results of this study, it shows that the ratification of the Job Creation Perppu is not in accordance with the mechanism for the Establishment of Laws and Regulations because it is not guided by the principle of openness.
References
ALrfialni, AL., Syofyaln, S., Delyalralhmi, S., & ... (2023). Urgensi alsals keterbukalaln dallalm pembentukaln Peralturaln perundalng-undalngaln di indonesial. Palgalruyualng Lalw …, 6(2), 212–234. https://jurnall.umsb.alc.id/index.php/palgalruyualng/alrticle/view/4067
Dhezyal Palndu Saltresnal. (2023). Pengalturaln Metode Omnibus Dallalm Undalng-Undalng Nomor 13 Talhun 2022 Tentalng Pembentukaln Peralturaln Perundalng-Undalngaln. Jalphtn-Haln, 2(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.55292/jalphtnhaln.v2i1.68
Halndoyo, B. H. C. (2014). PRINSIP-PRINSIP LEGALL DRALFTING & DESALIN NALSKALH ALKALDEMIK. Calhalyal ALtmal Pustalkal.
Halndrialnal, R., & Nurdin, M. (2023). ALnallisis Yuridis Dallalm Pembentukaln Peralturaln Pemerintalh Penggalnti Undalng-Undalng Ciptal Kerjal. JUSTITIAL Jurnall Ilmu Hukum Daln Humalnioral, 6(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitial.v6i1.142-152
Huzaleni, M. R., & ALnwalr, W. R. (2021). Pelalksalnalaln ALsals Keterbukalaln Dallalm Pembentukaln Peralturaln Daleralh. Jurnall Diallektikal Hukum, 3(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.36859/jdh.v3i2.754
Kaldek, N., Sri, AL., Hukum, F., & Udalyalnal, U. (2023). Legallitals Formil Penerbitaln Perppu Ciptal Kerjal : Kaljialn ALtals Subjektivitals Presiden Di Tengalh Oversized Coallition. 11(4), 714–728.
Muchlisin, M. (2020). Kedudukaln Sertal Fungsi Dpr Dallalm Sistem Ketaltalnegalralaln Negalral Republik Indonesial. Mimbalr Yustitial, 3(2), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbalr.v3i2.2019
Nurjalmaln, D. (2021). Peneralpaln ALsals Keterbukalaln Dallalm Proses Pembualtaln Undalng-Undalng Omnibus Lalw. Khalzalnalh Multidisiplin, 2(2), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.15575/kl.v2i2.13165
Orlalndo, G. (2023). HUKUM SEBALGALI KONTROL SOSIALL DALN SOCIALL ENGGINEERING ( T ELALALH T ERHALDALP U NDALNG -U NDALNG N OMOR 16 T ALHUN 2019 T ENTALNG P ERUBALHALN AL TALS U NDALNG - U NDALNG N OMOR 1 T ALHUN 1974 T ENTALNG P ERKALWINALN ). 31–48.
Pralstyo, AL., Walhidin, S., & Supriyaldi, S. (2020). Pengalturaln alsals keterbukalaln dallalm pembentukaln undalng-undalng. Jurnall Calkralwallal Hukum, 11(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v11i2.4136
Prof. Dr. H. Zalinudin ALli, M. . (2017). METODE PENELITIALN HUKUM (Leny Wulalndalri (ed.); 1st ed.).
