Komparasi Sistem Hukum Dalam Peradilan

Studi Kasus Hukum Indonesia Dan Hukum Malaysia

Authors

  • Syifa Lailia Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Sri Hadiningrum Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v2i1.1879

Keywords:

Indonesia, Malaysia, legal system, judicial system

Abstract

Indonesia's legal system continues to be predominantly influenced by modern laws introduced by European countries, creating a distinctive character within the Indonesian legal framework. The familial nature of Indonesia's legal system tends to prioritize form over substance, paying less attention to moral aspects. This raises issues related to the imbalance of humanitarian values within the legal system. Despite its status as an independent and sovereign nation, Indonesia still grapples with cases of dishonesty and ethical violations in law enforcement. Therefore, this research aims to compare the judicial systems of Indonesia and Malaysia using a normative legal research method. The comparison reveals the complexity and uniqueness of legal development in both countries. Indonesia, inheriting Dutch civil law, has a court structure that separates general, religious, administrative, and military jurisdictions. In contrast, Malaysia, blending English law with Islamic and customary law, demonstrates strong diversification in court forms and jurisdictions. These differences reflect legal adaptations to history, culture, and the needs of local communities. While both systems have strengths and weaknesses, there is room for improvement in terms of dispute resolution efficiency and jurisdictional clarity.

References

Atmasasmita, R. (2000). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Mandar Maju.

Bogdan, M. (2019). PENGANTAR PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM. Penerbit Nusa Media.

Elsa Nurahma Lubis, A., & Dwi Fahmi, F. (2021). Pengenalan Dan Definisi Hukum Secara Umum (Literature Review Etika). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan, 2(6), 768–789. https://doi.org/10.31933/jimt.v2i6.622

Manan, B. (2005). Sistem Peradilan Berwibawa, Suatu Pencarian. FH UII Press.

Mohd. Yusuf DM, Armen, Fuad Aprima, Rikardo Marpaung, G. M. S. (2023). Penegak Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia (Studi Terhadap Advokat, Kepolisian, Kejaksaan Dan Hakim. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 5(2), 8.

Schlesinger, R. (1959). Comparative Law-Cases and Material. Foundation Press.

Simatupang, J. R., Ardiansah, & Sudi Fahmi. (2023). Efektivitas Penggunaan Media Telemedicine Berdasarkan Hukum Indonesia Dan Malaysia. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 18(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v18i1.7183

Somadiyono, S. (2018). Peran Kantor Wilayah Provinsi Jambi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Mekanisme Mediasi. Wajah Hukum, 1(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v1i1.16

Somadiyono, S. (2020). Perbandingan Sejarah Positivisme Hukum di Indonesia Sebagai Penentu Politik Hukum Dimasa yang Akan Datang. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 12(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v12i1.191

Syaefudin, M. A. F. (2019). HUKUM SIBER: PERBANDINGAN INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA. PT Nasya Expanding Management.

Warasih, E. (2005). Pranata Hukum : Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis. Suryandaru Utama.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-28

How to Cite

Syifa Lailia, & Sri Hadiningrum. (2023). Komparasi Sistem Hukum Dalam Peradilan : Studi Kasus Hukum Indonesia Dan Hukum Malaysia. Doktrin:Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v2i1.1879

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.