Asas Pemaafan Hakim dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia

Authors

  • Muh. Iksan Putra Kai Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Dian Ekawaty Ismail Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Suwitno Yutye Imran Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Suwitno Yutye Imran Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v2i1.1936

Keywords:

Rechterlijk Pardon, KUHP, Judge's Decision

Abstract

This research aims to find out what the judge's forgiveness policy (rechterlijk pardon) is in the New Criminal Code, to find out how the rechterlijk pardon formulation in the Dutch Criminal Code compares and to find out what the challenges of rechterlijk pardon (judge's forgiveness) will be in the future. The research method used is juridical-normative with a statutory approach and a case approach. The research results show that Rechterlijk Pardon puts a different concept in giving space to judges in handing down guilty decisions without criminal penalties. Before being ratified, the principle of judge forgiveness was already used in several countries, for example the Netherlands. Even judges in Indonesia have made several decisions that contain the value of the judge's forgiveness. In connection with the analysis of Rechterlijk Pardon's challenges, it is viewed from the perspective of law enforcement and legal culture in society.

 

 

References

Achmad, Ruben. “Hukum Pidana Sebagai Suatu Sistem.” Jurnal Legalitas 3, no. 2 (2012): 66–95.

Dewi, P M L, and I K R Setiabudhi. “Kebijakan Formulasi Rechterlijk Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim) Dalam RKUHP.” Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 9 (2020): 1–18. https://ocs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/62056.

Kholiq, Abdul,. Arief, Barda Nawawi,. & Soponyono, Eko. “Pidana Penjara Terbatas : Sebuah Gagasan Dan Reorientasi Terhadap Kebijakan Formulasi Jenis Sanksi Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Law Reform 11, no. 1 (2015): 100–112.

Marguery, T.P. “Doctoral Thesis Unity and Diversity of the Public Prosecutor Services in Europe: A Study of the Czech, Dutch, French, and Polish System.” Universitas Gronigen, 2008.

Pasal 70 a Undang-undang No 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Lembaran Negara Tahun 2012 Nomor 153 tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5532) (n.d.).

Remmelink, J. Pengantar Hukum Pidana Material 3 Hukum Penintensier, (Inleiding Tot de Studie van Het Nederland Strafrecht) Di Terjemahkan Oleh Moeliono. Yogyakarta: Maharsa Publishing, 2017.

Saputro, Ardery Ardhan. “Konsepsi Rechterlijk Pardon Atau Pemaafan Hakim Dalam Rancangan KUHP.” Jurnal Mimbar Hukum 26, no. 1 (2016): 61–67.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2001.

Syakir, Muhammad Yusuf. “Kebijakan Permaafan Hakim (Rechterlijk Pardon) Dalam KUHP Baru.” Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hukum 9, no. 1 (2023): 109–18.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Muh. Iksan Putra Kai, Dian Ekawaty Ismail, Suwitno Yutye Imran, & Suwitno Yutye Imran. (2023). Asas Pemaafan Hakim dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Doktrin:Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(1), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v2i1.1936

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.